Find That Hospital

Brattleboro Memorial Hospital

17 Belmont Ave, Brattleboro, VT 05301Map

(802) 257-0341

Medicare-certified hospitalEmergency servicesAcute Care HospitalsVoluntary non-profit - Private

What “Medicare-certified hospital” means more

Every hospital on this site is Medicare-certified, which requires meeting federal conditions of participation and periodic review. Certification is a floor, not a rating — it means the hospital may operate and bill Medicare, not that it performs well. Newer hospitals often show 'Not Available' on many measures simply because they haven't reported long enough.

What to do with this: treat certification as the entry ticket. The star, survey, and measures are how you compare one hospital to another.

Brattleboro Memorial Hospital is a private nonprofit acute-care hospital in Brattleboro, Windham County, Vermont. As of CMS data processed April 28, 2026, its overall hospital rating from CMS is 3 out of 5 stars, summarizing 41 quality measures — compared against a single national standard, not curved within Vermont.

CMS overall hospital rating

3

This is CMS’s summary of this hospital’s reported quality measures, compared against a single national standard — hospital stars are not curved within a state (nursing-home stars are; these work differently).

The overall hospital rating (1–5 stars) is CMS's summary of up to ~45 quality measures, compared against a single national standard. more

CMS rolls a hospital's reported measures — deaths, safety of care, readmissions, patient experience, and timely & effective care — into one star rating from 1 to 5. Two things matter about how it's built. First, the comparison is national: every hospital in the country is held to the same standard. That's different from nursing-home stars, which are curved within each state — so a 4-star hospital in Alabama and a 4-star hospital in Oregon met the same bar. Second, it's a summary: hospitals report different numbers of measures, and a hospital strong in one area and weak in another can land on the same star as one that's steady everywhere. Some hospitals — often small, specialty, psychiatric, or new ones — don't report enough measures to get a star at all, and CMS says why in a footnote.

What to do with this: use the star as a starting point, then read the sections below to see which parts are strong and which are weak — the star can't tell you that.

Where the rating comes from — CMS’s own measure counts

Measure groupReportedBetterNo differentWorse
Deaths (mortality)5 of 8050
Safety of care3 of 8030
Readmissions9 of 11180
Patient experience15 of 15n/an/an/a
Timely & effective care9 of 10n/an/an/a

Better / no different / worse are CMS’s own categories vs the national rate. CMS doesn’t publish that split for patient experience or timely-care measures (n/a).

How this hospital's measures split across CMS's five rating groups — and how many came out better, no different, or worse than national. more

Alongside the star itself, CMS publishes the ingredients: how many measures the hospital reported in each group (deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience, timely & effective care), and for the first three, how many of those measures came out better than, no different than, or worse than the national rate. These counts are CMS's own categorization, shown here exactly as published. They're the fastest honest way to see where a star came from.

What to do with this: scan for groups with any 'worse than national' count, then find those measures in the sections below and bring them up with the care team.

What patients said (HCAHPS survey)

The percent of surveyed patients who gave the most positive answer, next to CMS’s published national average (survey period 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025).

HCAHPS is the national patient survey — real patients, after real stays, answering standardized questions. more

After discharge, a random sample of each hospital's adult patients gets the same standardized survey: did nurses and doctors communicate well, was pain addressed, were medicines explained, was the room clean and quiet, would you recommend this place. The numbers shown are 'top-box' percentages — the share of patients who gave the most positive answer, like 'always'. CMS also publishes a summary star for the survey itself. Patient experience isn't the same thing as clinical quality, but it correlates with it, and it's the only measure here that comes straight from the people in the beds.

What to do with this: compare each percentage to the national average shown beside it, and weigh the survey by its size — the response count and rate are listed right below.

Survey scores depend on how many patients answered — check the number of completed surveys and the response rate. more

Not every patient is surveyed, and not everyone responds — response rates around 20–25% are typical. When too few patients complete the survey, CMS suppresses the scores and shows a footnote instead of a number; that footnote is CMS's own wording, shown here verbatim. A hospital with 'Not reported' survey scores is not a bad hospital — it's usually small, new, or treats patients the survey doesn't cover (like children's or psychiatric hospitals).

What to do with this: trust bigger survey counts more, and never read a blank as a bad sign — it isn't one.

CMS’s survey summary star:3(3 of 5 — summarizes only this survey)

Nurses always communicated well

This hospital77%
US average80%

Doctors always communicated well

This hospital79%
US average80%

Staff always explained medicines before giving them

This hospital61%
US average62%

Staff gave patients information about recovering at home

This hospital86%
US average87%

Room and bathroom were always clean

This hospital75%
US average74%

Area around the room was always quiet at night

This hospital45%
US average60%

Rated this hospital a 9 or 10 out of 10

This hospital66%
US average72%

Would definitely recommend this hospital

This hospital62%
US average71%

249 completed surveys · 20% response rate. Fewer surveys = read with more caution.

Safety: healthcare-associated infections

Standardized infection ratios (SIR) with CMS’s own better/no-different/worse-than-national category, shown word-for-word.

Infection numbers are SIRs — a ratio where 1 means 'about as many infections as predicted for a hospital like this'. Lower is better. more

Hospitals track infections patients pick up during care and report them to the CDC. The number shown is a standardized infection ratio (SIR): observed infections divided by the number predicted for a hospital of that size and type. An SIR of 1 means about as many as predicted; 0.5 means half; 2 means double. Because small numbers bounce around, CMS also publishes whether each SIR is statistically better, no different, or worse than the national benchmark — that category is the more reliable signal, and it's shown here verbatim.

What to do with this: put more weight on the category than the raw ratio, and ask any hospital how visitors and family can help with infection precautions — good teams love that question.

'Better / No different / Worse than the national rate' is CMS's own statistical category — shown here exactly as CMS publishes it. more

For most safety and outcome measures, CMS doesn't just publish a number — it tests whether the hospital's result is statistically better than, no different than, or worse than the national rate, and publishes that category. 'No different' is the honest middle: most hospitals land there on most measures. 'Number of cases too small' means CMS couldn't reliably tell either way. This site shows CMS's category word-for-word and never invents its own verdicts — when you see 'Worse than the national rate' on this page, that's CMS's math, not our opinion.

What to do with this: treat 'better' and 'worse' as CMS's statistically meaningful flags, and treat 'no different' as exactly that — not a hidden good or bad.

What CLABSI means more

A central line is a catheter placed in a large vein, common in ICUs. Because it runs straight to the bloodstream, germs on it cause serious, largely preventable infections. Hospitals prevent CLABSI with strict insertion checklists, daily line reviews, and removing lines as soon as they're not needed.

What to do with this: if your person has a central line, it's fair to ask each day whether it's still needed — that one question mirrors what good hospitals already do.

What CAUTI means more

Urinary catheters are common during surgery and serious illness, and the longer one stays in, the higher the infection risk. Hospitals prevent CAUTI by using catheters only when needed and removing them promptly.

What to do with this: ask whether a catheter is still necessary each day it's in — prompt removal is the main prevention.

What surgical site infections (SSI) mean more

Surgical site infections happen where the body was opened, from skin-level to deep tissue. CMS publicly reports them for two tracer operations — colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy — because they're common enough to measure reliably. Prevention lives in the details: antibiotics timed right before the incision, sterile technique, warming, glucose control, and wound care after.

What to do with this: before a planned surgery, ask what the team does to prevent surgical infections and what warning signs to watch for at home.

What MRSA means more

MRSA is a strain of staph that standard antibiotics don't kill, which makes bloodstream infections with it dangerous and harder to treat. Hospitals fight it with hand hygiene, screening, isolation when needed, and careful device care.

What to do with this: the single best defense is hand hygiene — it is always okay to ask anyone entering the room, gently, whether they've cleaned their hands.

What C. diff means more

Clostridioides difficile causes serious diarrhea and gut inflammation, usually after antibiotics have cleared out the normal gut bacteria that keep it in check. It spreads by spores that survive on surfaces, so cleaning and hand-washing with soap and water (sanitizer doesn't kill the spores) matter enormously. It's one of the most common hospital-acquired infections nationwide.

What to do with this: ask whether every antibiotic your person is on is still needed — unnecessary antibiotics are C. diff's best friend.

MeasureThis hospitalNational benchmark (SIR)CMS’s comparison
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI)lower is betterResults cannot be calculated for this reporting period.1Not Available
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI)lower is betterResults cannot be calculated for this reporting period.1Not Available
Surgical site infections after colon surgery (SSI)lower is betterResults cannot be calculated for this reporting period.1Not Available
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy (SSI)lower is betterResults cannot be calculated for this reporting period.1Not Available
MRSA bloodstream infectionslower is betterResults cannot be calculated for this reporting period.1Not Available
C. difficile (C. diff) intestinal infectionslower is better0.6481No Different than National Benchmark

Reporting period: 07/01/2024–06/30/2025. Dates are CMS’s own for each measure.

Complications & deaths

Risk-adjusted rates — hospitals that treat sicker patients aren’t penalized for it — with CMS’s national comparison verbatim.

Death rates count patients who died within 30 days of admission for specific conditions — risk-adjusted, compared to the national rate. more

For conditions like heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, stroke, and bypass surgery, CMS tracks the share of Medicare patients who died within 30 days of admission — wherever the death occurred, in the hospital or after discharge. The rates are risk-adjusted for how sick each hospital's patients were, and each comes with CMS's better/no-different/worse-than-national category. The hospital-wide measure rolls all causes together. The complication measures work the same way: serious avoidable problems after procedures like hip or knee replacement.

What to do with this: look first at the condition that matters to your situation — if you're going in for heart surgery, the CABG line matters more than the composite.

Death, complication, and readmission rates are risk-adjusted — hospitals that take sicker patients aren't penalized for it. more

A hospital that takes the hardest cases will lose more patients than one that doesn't — that's arithmetic, not quality. So CMS risk-adjusts these measures: each hospital's rate is adjusted for how old and how sick its patients were, so that what's left reflects care, not case mix. It isn't perfect — no adjustment fully captures how sick someone is — but it means a big-city trauma center and a small community hospital can be compared more fairly than raw numbers would allow.

What to do with this: read the rates as adjusted comparisons, not raw odds — and put the most weight on CMS's better/worse-than-national category, which accounts for the statistical uncertainty too.

MeasureThis hospitalUS nationalCMS’s comparison
Death rate for heart attack patients (30-day)lower is betterThe number of cases/patients is too few to report.12.2%Number of Cases Too Small
Death rate for heart bypass (CABG) surgery patients (30-day)lower is betterResults are not available for this reporting period.2.6%Not Available
Death rate for COPD patients (30-day)lower is better9.5%8.8%No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients (30-day)lower is better12.1%11.6%No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients (30-day)lower is better20.4%16.2%No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients (30-day)lower is better18.6%13.3%No Different Than the National Rate
Hospital-wide death rate, all causes (risk-standardized)lower is better4.5%4.2%No Different Than the National Rate
Serious complication rate for hip/knee replacement patientslower is better3.6%3.6%No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical patients with serious treatable complicationslower is betterThe number of cases/patients is too few to report.173.3 per 1,000Number of Cases Too Small
Patient safety & adverse events composite (PSI-90)lower is better0.951No Different Than the National Value

Reporting periods vary by measure: 07/01/2021–06/30/2024 · 07/01/2023–06/30/2024 · 04/01/2021–03/31/2024 · 07/01/2022–06/30/2024. Dates are CMS’s own for each measure.

Readmissions

How often patients were back in a hospital within 30 days of going home — risk-adjusted, with CMS’s national comparison.

Readmission rates count patients back in a hospital within 30 days of going home — risk-adjusted, compared to the national rate. more

Being back in a hospital within a month of discharge is sometimes unavoidable — but high readmission rates can reflect discharges that happened too fast, instructions that didn't stick, or follow-up that fell through. CMS tracks 30-day readmissions for specific conditions and hospital-wide, risk-adjusts them, and categorizes each against the national rate. For a caregiver, this measure is personal: readmissions are the revolving door you're trying to avoid.

What to do with this: before discharge, ask for the written plan — medicines reconciled, follow-up appointment booked, a phone number for questions, and the warning signs that mean 'call now'.

MeasureThis hospitalUS nationalCMS’s comparison
Readmission rate for heart attack patients (30-day)lower is betterThe number of cases/patients is too few to report.13.6%Number of Cases Too Small
Readmission rate after heart bypass (CABG) surgery (30-day)lower is betterResults are not available for this reporting period.10.6%Not Available
Readmission rate for COPD patients (30-day)lower is better18.1%18.2%No Different Than the National Rate
Readmission rate for heart failure patients (30-day)lower is better19.3%19.7%No Different Than the National Rate
Readmission rate after hip/knee replacement (30-day)lower is better4.5%4.8%No Different Than the National Rate
Readmission rate for pneumonia patients (30-day)lower is better14.8%16%No Different Than the National Rate
Hospital-wide readmission rate, all causes (risk-standardized)lower is better14.4%15%No Different Than the National Rate

Reporting periods vary by measure: 07/01/2021–06/30/2024 · 07/01/2023–06/30/2024. Dates are CMS’s own for each measure.

Timely & effective care

ER waits, sepsis care, and staff flu vaccination. CMS publishes plain numbers for these (no better/worse category), so the national average is beside each for context.

Process measures: ER waits, patients who left before being seen, sepsis care, staff flu vaccination. CMS reports numbers, not categories, for these. more

These measures track how the hospital's processes actually run. ER time is the median minutes patients spent in the emergency department before leaving; 'left before being seen' is the share who gave up waiting. Sepsis care measures how often patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got every step of the recommended treatment bundle — sepsis is a leading cause of hospital death, and the bundle is time-critical. Staff flu vaccination protects patients who can't afford to catch it. CMS publishes these as plain numbers without a better/worse category, so the national average is shown beside each for context — the comparison is yours to make.

What to do with this: ER numbers matter most if you'll actually use this ER — for a planned admission, weigh the sepsis and vaccination numbers more.

ED volume is CMS's size label for the emergency department: low, medium, high, or very high. more

CMS labels each emergency department by how many visits it handles per year. It's context, not quality — a 'very high' volume ER sees more of everything (and often has more specialists on hand) but may also have longer waits; a 'low' volume ER may be faster but transfer complex cases elsewhere.

What to do with this: read the ER wait times in light of the volume — and if your person has a complex condition, ask whether this ER typically treats it or transfers it.

MeasureThis hospitalUS average
Average time patients spent in the emergency department before leavinglower is better176 min161 min
Patients who left the emergency department before being seenlower is better4%2%
Patients who got appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shockhigher is better62%64%
Healthcare workers given the flu vaccinehigher is better95%78%
Emergency department volumelow

Reporting periods vary by measure: 07/01/2024–06/30/2025 · 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 · 10/01/2024–03/31/2025. Dates are CMS’s own for each measure.

Other hospitals in Windham County

When there’s a choice, most people compare two or three. Same county, sorted by CMS overall rating:

Brattleboro Retreatnot ratedBrattleboro
Grace Cottage Hospitalnot ratedTownshend

All hospitals in Windham County

Facing a hospital stay? Go in with questions.

Built from this hospital’s own CMS data — calm questions to bring to the doctor, the nurse, or the patient advocate.

  • 62% of surveyed patients said they would definitely recommend this hospital (national average: 71%) — ask what patients most often wish they'd known before their stay.
  • Ask who is coordinating the care — the attending physician, the hospitalist, or a specialist — and how you reach that person with a question.
  • Ask for a full medication list at admission AND discharge, and have someone read it against what your person was taking at home — medicine mix-ups around transitions are one of the most common preventable harms.
  • Ask what the discharge plan will include in writing — medicines, follow-up appointments, warning signs, and the phone number to call with questions in the first week home.

What this page can’t show you

CMS’s public hospital data has no inspection reports, no complaint records, no penalty history, and no prices. Nothing on this page means “no problems on record”; it means records of that kind aren’t in this dataset at all.

Where inspection records actually live more

CMS's public hospital quality data has real limits. It contains no state inspection findings, no complaint or enforcement history, no malpractice information, no prices, and nothing about any individual physician. A page with nothing bad shown does NOT mean a clean record — it means records of that kind aren't in this dataset at all. Inspection and complaint history for hospitals lives with your state health department; costs live with your insurer and the hospital's own price transparency files.

What to do with this: never read 'nothing shown' as 'nothing happened.' For inspection history, ask your state health department; and verify anything important at medicare.gov/care-compare.

Data: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (data.cms.gov), last updated April 28, 2026 (patient survey period 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025); measure reporting periods vary and are shown per section. This site is not affiliated with CMS or any government agency.